PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMMX vs. USMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMMX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than USMSX's 0.62% return.


FDMMX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.08%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
1.76%

USMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.92%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMMX
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
1.48%5.24%1.27%5.76%-9.67%1.11%4.27%7.09%-0.13%5.48%
USMSX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
0.62%2.87%3.09%3.21%-0.90%-0.15%0.77%1.90%1.01%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMMX and USMSX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.34

The correlation between FDMMX and USMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMMX vs. USMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMMX
FDMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FDMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

USMSX
USMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
USMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMMXUSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

4.78

-3.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

8.25

-5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

44.53

-36.30

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is lower than the USMSX Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMMX and USMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMMXUSMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

4.15

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

2.47

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.89

-0.77

Drawdowns

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMMX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, which is greater than USMSX's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMMX and USMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMMXUSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-2.09%

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-0.30%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-0.50%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-2.03%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-0.22%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.06%

+0.79%

Volatility

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FDMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMMXUSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.20%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

0.45%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

0.59%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

0.70%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

0.73%

+3.12%

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDMMX and USMSX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FDMMX vs. USMSX - Dividend Comparison

FDMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than USMSX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMMX
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
2.71%3.54%2.67%2.43%1.46%2.31%2.23%2.63%2.76%2.99%4.56%3.20%
USMSX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
2.33%2.42%2.84%2.35%0.70%0.05%0.57%1.28%1.01%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMMX and USMSX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDMMX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to USMSX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMMX dropped -18.98% vs USMSX's -2.09%.

USMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMMX and USMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer