PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIVX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Diversified International Fund (FDIVX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIVX achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 31.62% return.


FDIVX

1D
1.58%
1M
4.92%
YTD
14.83%
6M
15.42%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.84%

LIAGX

1D
3.10%
1M
8.86%
YTD
31.62%
6M
32.47%
1Y
46.66%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDIVX
Fidelity Diversified International Fund
14.83%27.75%6.54%17.74%-23.86%6.07%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
31.62%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIVX and LIAGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.95

The correlation between FDIVX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIVX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIVX
FDIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Diversified International Fund (FDIVX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDIVXLIAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.14

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

12.34

-3.79

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIVX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIVX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIVX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-37.87%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-14.56%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-17.11%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

-37.87%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-13.13%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.70%

-0.52%

Volatility

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Diversified International Fund (FDIVX) is 6.95%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that FDIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

10.92%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

20.39%

-5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

22.80%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

19.22%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

19.22%

-2.17%

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIVX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIVX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FDIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than LIAGX's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIVX
Fidelity Diversified International Fund
9.31%10.69%3.93%4.29%1.34%10.59%0.97%1.32%7.32%4.22%1.36%0.46%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.29%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDIVX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIAGX has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to FDIVX (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIVX dropped -60.61% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIVX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer