FDIG vs. TOXR
FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) and TOXR (21Shares XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while TOXR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for TOXR.
Performance
FDIG vs. TOXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than TOXR's -34.38% return.
FDIG
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 50.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOXR
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -14.04%
- YTD
- -34.38%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIG vs. TOXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 19.73% | -12.56% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | -34.38% | -9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIG and TOXR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIG vs. TOXR — Risk / Return Rank
FDIG
TOXR
FDIG vs. TOXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and 21Shares XRP ETF (TOXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIG | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIG | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -0.92 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
FDIG vs. TOXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than TOXR's maximum drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and TOXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIG | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -48.78% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -48.10% | +27.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -31.50% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.11% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIG vs. TOXR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIG | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.60% | 73.16% | -23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 73.16% | -12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 73.16% | -12.35% |
FDIG vs. TOXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TOXR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIG vs. TOXR - Dividend Comparison
FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while TOXR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIG and TOXR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOXR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOXR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDIG.
FDIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for TOXR.
FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while TOXR is Cryptocurrency. FDIG tracks Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while TOXR tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.30% for TOXR.
Find the right allocation for FDIG and TOXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer