FDGRX vs. PRUFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX).
FDGRX is managed by Fidelity. PRUFX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Apr 11, 1950.
Performance
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | -0.67% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
PRUFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | -10.33% | 15.79% | 38.50% | 45.49% | -40.03% | 20.01% | 37.08% | 31.83% | -0.90% | 33.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly higher than PRUFX's -10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed PRUFX with an annualized return of 20.61%, while PRUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.42% annualized return.
FDGRX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 41.58%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.61%
PRUFX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -9.87%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUFX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDGRX vs. PRUFX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGRX
PRUFX
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDGRX | PRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.60 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.02 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.78 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 2.55 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDGRX | PRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.60 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.33 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.66 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGRX and PRUFX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Dividend Comparison
FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.05%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
PRUFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | 15.05% | 13.50% | 13.20% | 3.33% | 3.54% | 9.50% | 3.64% | 2.52% | 9.26% | 13.72% | 2.38% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than PRUFX's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and PRUFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGRX | PRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.62% | -46.35% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -17.97% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.25% | -46.35% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | -46.35% | +6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -14.00% | +7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -9.66% | -6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 5.47% | -1.68% |
Volatility
FDGRX vs. PRUFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX) at 6.83%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDGRX | PRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 6.83% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.35% | 12.66% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.71% | 21.95% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 23.09% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 22.05% | +1.28% |