FDGKX vs. NEIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).
FDGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.
Performance
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K | -3.13% | 19.47% | 24.72% | 18.00% | -11.54% | 28.10% | 2.31% | 28.84% | -7.09% | 18.03% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 3.55% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 11.61%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.
FDGKX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 22.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
NEIMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDGKX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGKX
NEIMX
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDGKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.58 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 2.21 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.11 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 10.67 | -3.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDGKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.58 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.02 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.02 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.03 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGKX and NEIMX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than NEIMX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K | 7.04% | 6.82% | 7.46% | 3.57% | 11.59% | 7.90% | 1.98% | 4.95% | 23.08% | 15.37% | 1.70% | 8.50% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and NEIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.34% | -92.94% | +39.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -10.78% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.35% | -92.94% | +71.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.28% | -92.94% | +51.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.15% | -90.28% | +80.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -9.91% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.13% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FDGKX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 3.41%. This indicates that FDGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDGKX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 3.41% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 8.30% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 15.57% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 576.30% | -559.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 407.62% | -388.42% |