PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGFX vs. VTAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than VTAPX's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has outperformed VTAPX with an annualized return of 14.19%, while VTAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.


FDGFX

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.10%
YTD
17.51%
6M
19.03%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
14.19%

VTAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
17.51%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.05%6.03%4.73%4.59%-2.84%5.26%4.97%4.85%0.53%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and VTAPX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.06

The correlation between FDGFX and VTAPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. VTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VTAPX
VTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGFXVTAPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

3.03

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

5.02

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.65

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

6.45

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.79

25.59

-7.79

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the VTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and VTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGFXVTAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

3.03

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.27

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.41

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.07

-0.54

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than VTAPX's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and VTAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGFXVTAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-5.33%

-55.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-0.72%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-0.92%

-20.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-5.33%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

-5.33%

-35.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.04%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-1.03%

-6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

0.18%

+2.08%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) at 0.57%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGFXVTAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

0.57%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

1.11%

+9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

1.52%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

2.67%

+13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

2.23%

+16.99%

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VTAPX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGFX vs. VTAPX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than VTAPX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.12%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.55%3.78%2.68%2.84%6.82%4.67%1.19%1.94%2.45%1.52%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGFX and VTAPX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to VTAPX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs VTAPX's -5.33%.

VTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGFX and VTAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer