PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGFX vs. SSAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than SSAQX's 8.01% return.


FDGFX

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.10%
YTD
17.51%
6M
19.03%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
14.19%

SSAQX

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.86%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
17.51%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%10.96%
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
8.01%17.43%5.04%28.87%-18.27%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and SSAQX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.93

The correlation between FDGFX and SSAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. SSAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SSAQX
SSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGFXSSAQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

2.21

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

3.04

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

2.47

+1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.79

10.62

+7.17

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the SSAQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and SSAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGFXSSAQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

2.21

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.51

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than SSAQX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and SSAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGFXSSAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-31.70%

-29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-10.74%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-31.70%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-31.70%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-8.08%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.49%

-0.23%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) at 3.04%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGFXSSAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.04%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

9.23%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

11.99%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.86%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

18.86%

+0.36%

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAQX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGFX vs. SSAQX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, less than SSAQX's 11.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.12%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
11.13%12.02%0.00%3.83%9.83%13.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDGFX and SSAQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to SSAQX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs SSAQX's -31.70%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGFX and SSAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer