FDGFX vs. PYHRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) and PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FDGFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PYHRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX returned 14.19%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for PYHRX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDGFX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PYHRX.

Performance

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than PYHRX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has outperformed PYHRX with an annualized return of 14.19%, while PYHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.

FDGFX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 27.43%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: 14.19%

PYHRX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	17.51%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	2.36%	8.73%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and PYHRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998	0.33

Over the past year, FDGFX and PYHRX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. PYHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDGFX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	3.76	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	5.91	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.89	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	4.56	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.79	24.63	-6.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the PYHRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and PYHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDGFX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98	3.76	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	0.10	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.17	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.26	+0.27

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than PYHRX's maximum drawdown of -50.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and PYHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGFX	PYHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.77%	-50.79%	-9.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-2.02%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.37%	-50.79%	+29.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	-50.79%	+29.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.29%	-50.79%	+9.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-2.12%	-5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	0.37%	+1.89%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) at 0.75%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGFX	PYHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	0.75%	+3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	1.96%	+8.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.48%	2.46%	+11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	51.06%	-34.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	36.29%	-17.07%

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PYHRX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGFX vs. PYHRX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than PYHRX's 6.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.12%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.42%	6.81%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGFX and PYHRX in my portfolio?

FDGFX and PYHRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGFX or PYHRX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to PYHRX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs PYHRX's -50.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.