FDGFX vs. PSECX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX).
FDGFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 27, 1993. PSECX is managed by Pinnacle Capital Management. It was launched on Jan 21, 2011.
Performance
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | -3.17% | 22.48% | 27.58% | 17.86% | -11.61% | 27.96% | 2.20% | 28.75% | -7.23% | 18.05% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | -2.01% | 8.04% | 14.49% | 10.64% | -10.66% | 25.43% | 0.78% | 23.99% | -5.18% | 5.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than PSECX's -2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has outperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 12.06%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.
FDGFX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
PSECX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -3.71%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDGFX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGFX
PSECX
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDGFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.59 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 0.93 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.82 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 3.31 | +5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDGFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.59 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.52 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGFX and PSECX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison
FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than PSECX's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | 9.66% | 9.35% | 9.81% | 3.48% | 11.46% | 7.81% | 1.89% | 4.84% | 22.93% | 15.35% | 1.58% | 8.44% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 0.87% | 0.85% | 3.88% | 2.71% | 4.60% | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.16% | 6.78% | 0.59% | 0.31% | 5.12% |
Drawdowns
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and PSECX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -31.13% | -29.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -8.36% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -18.47% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.29% | -31.13% | -10.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -7.44% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -3.90% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.07% | +0.63% |
Volatility
FDGFX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) at 3.06%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDGFX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 3.06% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 7.60% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 13.13% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 11.90% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 13.17% | +5.97% |