FDGFX vs. AMFEX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FDGFX returned 16.01%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for AMFEX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDGFX charges 0.48%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.

Performance

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than AMFEX's 16.92% return.

FDGFX

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 3.15%
• 6M: 14.92%
• YTD: 20.24%
• 1Y: 32.53%
• 3Y*: 26.45%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 14.06%
• ALL TIME*: 10.58%

AMFEX

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 10.35%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	20.24%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-10.00%
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund	16.92%	17.33%	16.28%	17.32%	-14.08%	22.58%	12.70%	24.62%	-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and AMFEX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018	0.89

The correlation between FDGFX and AMFEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AMFEX

AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDGFX	AMFEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.71	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.67	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	4.49	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.21	18.71	-5.50

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and AMFEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGFX	AMFEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.77%	-30.41%	-30.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-6.07%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.37%	-15.23%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	-21.21%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-4.23%	-3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	1.45%	+0.99%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.79%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGFX	AMFEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	2.79%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	7.85%	+4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.10%	10.08%	+5.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	14.24%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.29%	16.84%	+2.45%

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGFX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than AMFEX's 10.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund	10.25%	11.99%	9.19%	0.92%	4.82%	0.22%	0.44%	0.78%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.09%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGFX and AMFEX in my portfolio?

FDGFX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGFX or AMFEX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to AMFEX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.