PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDFSX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class I (FDFSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFSX achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.26% return.


FDFSX

1D
2.32%
1M
-1.21%
6M
6.91%
YTD
10.67%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.99%

FDFPX

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.99%
6M
8.37%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDFSX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class I
10.67%23.07%13.68%19.25%-18.28%15.96%17.36%8.68%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
12.26%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFSX and FDFPX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FDFSX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDFSX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDFSX
FDFSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FDFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class I (FDFSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDFSXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.40

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

10.04

-1.56

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFSX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFSX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFSX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDFSXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-31.22%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-9.54%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-15.42%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-27.41%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-2.19%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-5.76%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.28%

+0.10%

Volatility

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class I (FDFSX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDFSXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.37%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

12.20%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

14.21%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

15.34%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.21%

+0.01%

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDFSX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

FDFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.81%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%
FDFSX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class I
5.76%4.70%0.58%1.84%8.60%6.72%2.70%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FDFSX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFSX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FDFPX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFSX dropped -31.32% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDFSX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer