PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDFQX vs. FIRVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFQX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than FIRVX's 1,440,933.92% return.


FDFQX

1D
1.48%
1M
3.20%
YTD
13.53%
6M
13.60%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

FIRVX

1D
1,371,718.18%
1M
1,382,668.54%
YTD
1,440,933.92%
6M
1,442,468.36%
1Y
1,545,588.89%
3Y*
2,512.79%
5Y*
597.67%
10Y*
176.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z
13.53%23.20%13.74%19.34%-18.05%16.12%17.40%8.78%
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
1,440,933.92%12.25%5.86%10.72%-14.63%6.77%12.06%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFQX and FIRVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.91

The correlation between FDFQX and FIRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDFQX vs. FIRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFQX
FDFQX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDFQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRVX
FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDFQXFIRVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-351,352.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

49,085.82

-49,084.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

356,370.91

-356,367.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

1,512,145.77

-1,512,133.07

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FIRVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFQX and FIRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFQX drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum FIRVX drawdown of -40.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFQX and FIRVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDFQXFIRVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-40.59%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-4.51%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.11%

-6.52%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-20.10%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-4.97%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.06%

+1.23%

Volatility

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) is 5.80%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a volatility of 952.63%. This indicates that FDFQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDFQXFIRVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

952.63%

-946.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

952.62%

-940.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

1,374,447.92%

-1,374,434.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

614,671.81%

-614,656.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

434,465.54%

-434,448.34%

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFQX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FIRVX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDFQX vs. FIRVX - Dividend Comparison

FDFQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than FIRVX's 102.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z
5.78%4.85%2.12%2.13%8.91%6.80%2.67%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
102.87%2.83%2.74%2.57%3.52%4.61%3.74%3.18%6.90%25.16%2.28%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDFQX and FIRVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to FDFQX (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFQX dropped -31.30% vs FIRVX's -40.59%.

FDFQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDFQX and FIRVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer