PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDFQX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFQX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.01% return.


FDFQX

1D
2.29%
1M
-1.17%
6M
6.95%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.12%

DRIQX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.44%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z
10.70%23.20%13.74%19.34%-18.05%16.12%17.40%8.78%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.01%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFQX and DRIQX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.65

The correlation between FDFQX and DRIQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDFQX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDFQX
FDFQX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FDFQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDFQXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.90

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

7.47

+1.02

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFQX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFQX drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than DRIQX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFQX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDFQXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-19.86%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-3.47%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.11%

-5.12%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-19.86%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-1.30%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.84%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

0.88%

+1.50%

Volatility

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z (FDFQX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.10%. This indicates that FDFQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDFQXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

1.10%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

3.60%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

4.52%

+9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

7.07%

+8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

6.58%

+10.59%

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFQX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDFQX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

FDFQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than DRIQX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.36%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
FDFQX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class Z
5.93%4.85%2.12%2.13%8.91%6.80%2.67%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDFQX and DRIQX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFQX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to DRIQX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFQX dropped -31.30% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

DRIQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDFQX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer