FDFIX vs. YFSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX).

FDFIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 9, 2017. YFSIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 30, 2017.

Performance

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	-7.27%	17.59%	25.06%	26.27%	-18.10%	28.69%	18.46%	31.47%	-4.45%	14.41%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	8.16%	14.91%	-0.34%	16.64%	-9.15%	13.13%	18.46%	24.40%	2.18%	18.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFIX achieves a -7.27% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 8.16% return.

FDFIX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -7.59%
• YTD: -7.27%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: —

YFSIX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

YFSIX

AMG Yacktman Global Fund

FDFIX

Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund

Return for Risk

FDFIX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFIX

FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

YFSIX

YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 51
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDFIX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.99	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.16	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	1.36	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	4.42	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFIX and YFSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDFIX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.99	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.45	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.71	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between FDFIX and YFSIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

FDFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	1.20%	1.11%	1.26%	1.48%	1.70%	1.27%	1.52%	1.78%	2.16%	0.50%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.68%	8.02%	4.32%	8.18%	4.76%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%

Drawdowns

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFIX drawdown since its inception was -33.77%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFIX and YFSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDFIX	YFSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.77%	-35.10%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-14.20%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	-25.14%	+0.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.99%	-11.03%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-4.93%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	4.38%	-1.78%

Volatility

FDFIX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) is 4.22%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that FDFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDFIX	YFSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	9.23%	-5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	19.89%	-10.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	21.29%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	15.11%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	16.20%	+2.48%