PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEIX vs. QKACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class I (FDEIX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEIX achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than QKACX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEIX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 15.58%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.


FDEIX

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.48%
YTD
8.79%
6M
10.50%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
15.58%

QKACX

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.20%
YTD
6.95%
6M
8.31%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
16.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDEIX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class I
8.79%27.44%26.86%24.00%-8.17%25.18%8.93%31.14%-9.21%16.45%
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
6.95%21.16%31.05%23.55%-14.17%31.45%22.00%26.88%-2.65%21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEIX and QKACX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between FDEIX and QKACX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEIX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEIX
FDEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QKACX
QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class I (FDEIX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEIXQKACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.70

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

12.64

+1.56

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEIX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEIXQKACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.95

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.90

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.48

+0.06

Drawdowns

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEIX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, roughly equal to the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEIX and QKACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEIXQKACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.82%

-60.51%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-8.66%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-19.42%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-23.05%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-36.47%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.02%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-11.20%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.85%

+0.26%

Volatility

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class I (FDEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) at 2.72%. This indicates that FDEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QKACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEIXQKACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.72%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

9.47%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

11.99%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.37%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

18.70%

+0.13%

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEIX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

FDEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than QKACX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEIX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class I
9.45%10.28%8.81%4.21%5.46%5.49%4.32%7.30%15.57%5.32%2.82%5.75%
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
4.42%4.72%8.90%1.45%11.20%17.85%3.09%3.41%8.83%0.74%0.00%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEIX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEIX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to QKACX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEIX dropped -57.82% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

FDEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEIX and QKACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer