FDCPX vs. PRGTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FDCPX (Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio) and PRGTX (T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDCPX returned 28.05%/yr vs 19.45%/yr for PRGTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDCPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PRGTX.

Performance

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCPX achieves a 80.20% return, which is significantly higher than PRGTX's 42.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCPX has outperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 28.05%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.45% annualized return.

FDCPX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: 24.47%
• YTD: 80.20%
• 6M: 80.64%
• 1Y: 140.17%
• 3Y*: 55.98%
• 5Y*: 29.44%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

PRGTX

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: 19.26%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 41.99%
• 1Y: 79.69%
• 3Y*: 39.44%
• 5Y*: 11.40%
• 10Y*: 19.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	80.20%	54.44%	22.40%	33.52%	-28.63%	23.68%	46.07%	40.15%	-6.30%	32.64%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	42.26%	27.28%	33.12%	55.92%	-55.53%	8.85%	75.77%	34.22%	-10.07%	47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCPX and PRGTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001	0.85

The correlation between FDCPX and PRGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDCPX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCPX

FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PRGTX

PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 91
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDCPX	PRGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.06	3.55	+2.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.35	4.16	+2.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.88	1.58	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.66	6.15	+8.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	56.55	19.42	+37.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCPX Sharpe Ratio is 6.06, which is higher than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCPX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDCPX	PRGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.06	3.55	+2.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.32	0.36	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.29	0.69	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.47	+0.09

Drawdowns

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCPX drawdown since its inception was -81.96%, which is greater than PRGTX's maximum drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCPX and PRGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDCPX	PRGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.96%	-71.18%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-13.06%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.59%	-26.67%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.29%	-65.29%	+30.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.29%	-65.29%	+30.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-21.54%	-4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	4.13%	-1.62%

Volatility

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) have volatilities of 8.02% and 8.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDCPX	PRGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	8.25%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	18.67%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	23.13%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.49%	31.79%	-9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	28.39%	-6.49%

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDCPX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	5.93%	14.38%	7.58%	0.51%	17.72%	16.95%	8.81%	12.15%	23.69%	10.50%	6.57%	4.53%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	27.71%	5.05%	0.15%	24.67%	15.81%	9.46%	10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDCPX and PRGTX in my portfolio?

FDCPX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDCPX or PRGTX?

PRGTX has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to FDCPX (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCPX dropped -81.96% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.06 vs 3.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.