FDCPX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDCPX (Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio) and FIKHX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z) are both Technology Equities funds from Fidelity. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDCPX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKHX.

Performance

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDCPX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -3.80%
• 6M: 46.22%
• YTD: 62.74%
• 1Y: 101.29%
• 3Y*: 49.02%
• 5Y*: 26.82%
• 10Y*: 26.06%
• ALL TIME*: 14.79%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	62.74%	54.44%	22.40%	33.52%	-28.63%	23.68%	46.07%	40.15%	-15.49%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCPX and FIKHX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FDCPX and FIKHX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDCPX	FIKHX
Technology	93.3%	97.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	1.2%
Industrials	0.9%	-
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDCPX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDCPX

FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FIKHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.04	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.88%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.38%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.81%	—	—

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCPX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while FIKHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	6.57%	14.38%	7.58%	0.51%	17.72%	16.95%	8.81%	12.15%	23.69%	10.50%	6.57%	4.53%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDCPX and FIKHX in my portfolio?

FDCPX and FIKHX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.