FDCPX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX).

FDCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985. FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	13.68%	54.44%	22.40%	33.52%	-28.63%	23.68%	46.07%	40.15%	-15.48%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Returns By Period

FDCPX

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: -4.43%
• YTD: 13.68%
• 6M: 16.42%
• 1Y: 80.76%
• 3Y*: 35.76%
• 5Y*: 18.58%
• 10Y*: 22.08%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

FDCPX

Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio

FIKHX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

FDCPX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCPX

FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FDCPX and FIKHX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDCPX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.65%, more than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio	12.65%	14.38%	7.58%	0.51%	17.72%	16.95%	8.81%	12.15%	23.69%	10.50%	6.57%	4.53%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.23%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDCPX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.90%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.63%	—	—