PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCFX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCFX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FDCFX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.66%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
6.41%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDCFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C
6.15%13.47%6.05%11.14%-16.84%7.64%12.30%17.51%-5.79%14.18%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCFX and FCNTX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.87

The correlation between FDCFX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCFX
FDCFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FDCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCFXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.13

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

9.04

+2.39

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCFXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.72

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.79

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.89

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.78

-0.36

Drawdowns

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCFX drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCFX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCFXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-49.19%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-11.30%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-19.75%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-32.59%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.25%

-32.59%

+9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-8.16%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

2.65%

-1.33%

Volatility

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C (FDCFX) is 2.67%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FDCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCFXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.26%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

10.48%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.04%

14.03%

-6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

19.15%

-10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

19.68%

-10.63%

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FDCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FDCFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class C
7.09%7.04%3.91%1.54%8.31%10.14%6.37%6.02%8.67%5.15%3.63%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDCFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FDCFX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCFX dropped -47.97% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FDCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCFX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer