PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDAFX vs. FISNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAFX achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than FISNX's 5.70% return.


FDAFX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.03%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.93%

FISNX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
5.70%
6M
6.03%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A
6.52%14.28%6.79%12.08%-16.22%8.40%13.09%18.40%-5.05%3.94%
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
5.70%11.53%5.63%10.21%-13.01%5.62%10.81%14.65%-3.42%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAFX and FISNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FDAFX and FISNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDAFX vs. FISNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAFX
FDAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FDAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FISNX
FISNX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FISNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FISNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDAFXFISNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.55

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.41

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

14.81

-2.50

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FISNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAFX and FISNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDAFXFISNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.68

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.64

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.88

-0.41

Drawdowns

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than FISNX's maximum drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAFX and FISNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDAFXFISNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-18.11%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-3.91%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

-5.77%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-18.11%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-3.46%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.90%

+0.39%

Volatility

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) at 1.99%. This indicates that FDAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FISNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDAFXFISNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

1.99%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

4.18%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

4.98%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

6.42%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.08%

6.42%

+2.66%

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FISNX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDAFX vs. FISNX - Dividend Comparison

FDAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than FISNX's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A
7.66%7.70%4.66%2.15%8.84%10.71%6.97%6.62%9.48%3.23%4.34%3.51%
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
4.01%3.68%4.39%3.17%5.92%6.53%3.63%5.29%5.20%2.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FDAFX and FISNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDAFX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to FISNX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAFX dropped -47.38% vs FISNX's -18.11%.

FISNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDAFX and FISNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer