PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDAFX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAFX achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 13.83% return.


FDAFX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.52%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.95%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
6.87%

FCTKX

1D
0.44%
1M
1.82%
YTD
13.83%
6M
15.32%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A
6.35%14.28%6.79%12.08%-16.22%8.40%13.09%18.40%-5.05%3.94%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
13.83%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAFX and FCTKX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FDAFX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDAFX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAFX
FDAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FDAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDAFXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.19

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

14.24

-2.60

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAFX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDAFXFCTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.44

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.70

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.77

-0.30

Drawdowns

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than FCTKX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAFX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDAFXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-30.94%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-9.78%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

-15.40%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-27.16%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.10%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-5.46%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.18%

-0.89%

Volatility

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) is 2.60%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that FDAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDAFXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

4.21%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

10.54%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

12.82%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

15.04%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.08%

15.88%

-6.80%

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDAFX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

FDAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than FCTKX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.14%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FDAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A
7.67%7.70%4.66%2.15%8.84%10.71%6.97%6.62%9.48%3.23%4.34%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FDAFX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to FDAFX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAFX dropped -47.38% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDAFX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer