PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDAAX vs. FFRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than FFRSX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has outperformed FFRSX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while FFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.38% annualized return.


FDAAX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.24%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
4.44%

FFRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
3.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDAAX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund
1.17%4.68%8.52%14.35%-1.37%8.55%-3.71%3.30%0.95%2.44%
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
1.02%5.61%6.71%8.04%-5.85%3.73%0.45%6.71%0.38%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAAX and FFRSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2010

0.51

The correlation between FDAAX and FFRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDAAX vs. FFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAAX
FDAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FDAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRSX
FFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDAAXFFRSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

2.26

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

5.13

-2.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.96

-0.62

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

5.02

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.22

17.54

-10.32

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAAX and FFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDAAXFFRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.26

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.85

1.37

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

1.04

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Drawdowns

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than FFRSX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and FFRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDAAXFFRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-17.13%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-1.07%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.70%

-1.45%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.22%

-7.54%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.08%

-17.13%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-0.91%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.31%

+0.28%

Volatility

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) at 0.51%. This indicates that FDAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDAAXFFRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.51%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

1.61%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

2.09%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

2.44%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

3.24%

+0.61%

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDAAX vs. FFRSX - Dividend Comparison

FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than FFRSX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDAAX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund
7.86%8.00%9.42%7.64%5.84%3.73%5.07%5.62%5.18%3.79%4.57%4.71%
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
5.80%6.38%6.95%6.88%4.15%2.92%3.37%4.62%4.41%3.68%3.76%3.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDAAX and FFRSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDAAX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to FFRSX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAAX dropped -25.74% vs FFRSX's -17.13%.

FFRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDAAX and FFRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer