PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVTX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than VSMVX's 16.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVTX having a 10.44% annualized return and VSMVX not far behind at 10.38%.


FCVTX

1D
1.98%
1M
4.24%
YTD
18.92%
6M
16.45%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.44%

VSMVX

1D
1.11%
1M
3.59%
YTD
16.60%
6M
16.14%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
18.92%7.53%7.42%17.19%-13.53%37.49%10.60%20.19%-15.58%11.68%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.60%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVTX and VSMVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2012

0.95

The correlation between FCVTX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVTX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVTX
FCVTX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FCVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVTXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

4.47

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

14.73

-2.41

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVTX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVTXVSMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.28

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.27

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.43

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.50

-0.07

Drawdowns

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than VSMVX's maximum drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-47.61%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-9.33%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.91%

-28.81%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-28.81%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-47.61%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-7.64%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.83%

+0.16%

Volatility

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) at 4.48%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.48%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

11.51%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

18.32%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

22.02%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

24.13%

-1.77%

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVTX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, more than VSMVX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
8.99%10.69%4.91%5.34%6.37%8.00%0.23%3.20%38.15%3.30%6.98%11.13%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.63%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FCVTX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVTX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to VSMVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VSMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVTX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer