FCVTX vs. TASVX
FCVTX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M) and TASVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCVTX returned 11.02%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for TASVX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FCVTX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for TASVX.
Performance
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 27.12% return, which is significantly higher than TASVX's 24.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVTX having a 11.02% annualized return and TASVX not far ahead at 11.08%.
FCVTX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- YTD
- 27.12%
- 1Y
- 37.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.46%
TASVX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- 45.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | 27.12% | 7.53% | 7.42% | 17.19% | -13.53% | 37.49% | 10.60% | 20.19% | -15.58% | 11.68% |
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund | 24.97% | 13.71% | 18.76% | 16.92% | -11.44% | 41.68% | -3.08% | 15.56% | -19.00% | 6.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCVTX and TASVX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FCVTX and TASVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCVTX vs. TASVX — Risk / Return Rank
FCVTX
TASVX
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCVTX | TASVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 5.55 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 19.61 | -5.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TASVX drawdown of -59.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and TASVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCVTX | TASVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | -59.79% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -8.75% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.91% | -23.91% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -24.62% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | -59.79% | +14.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -8.46% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.47% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) at 3.66%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TASVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCVTX | TASVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.66% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.51% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.84% | 16.66% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.38% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 26.36% | -4.02% |
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TASVX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCVTX vs. TASVX - Dividend Comparison
FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than TASVX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | 8.41% | 10.69% | 4.91% | 5.34% | 6.37% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 3.20% | 38.15% | 3.30% | 6.98% | 11.13% |
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund | 1.03% | 1.29% | 26.54% | 3.43% | 22.08% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 2.81% | 10.87% | 13.42% | 1.83% | 45.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FCVTX and TASVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCVTX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to TASVX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs TASVX's -59.79%.
TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCVTX and TASVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer