PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVIX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FCVIX

1D
1.97%
1M
4.29%
YTD
19.20%
6M
16.74%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.10%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
19.20%8.02%9.36%17.82%-13.07%38.10%11.21%20.76%-15.42%12.27%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVIX and FCNTX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FCVIX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCVIX
FCNTX

Financial Services

19.9%
13.8%

Industrials

12.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

11.4%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.1%

Technology

10.5%
27.0%

Real Estate

9.7%
0.1%

Energy

6.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

6.3%
2.1%

Utilities

4.7%
0.5%

Communication Services

0.6%
21.2%

Financial Services

FCVIX
19.9%
FCNTX
13.8%

Industrials

FCVIX
12.6%
FCNTX
8.6%

Healthcare

FCVIX
11.4%
FCNTX
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FCVIX
10.8%
FCNTX
10.1%

Technology

FCVIX
10.5%
FCNTX
27.0%

Real Estate

FCVIX
9.7%
FCNTX
0.1%

Energy

FCVIX
6.9%
FCNTX
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

FCVIX
6.7%
FCNTX
3.7%

Basic Materials

FCVIX
6.3%
FCNTX
2.1%

Utilities

FCVIX
4.7%
FCNTX
0.5%

Communication Services

FCVIX
0.6%
FCNTX
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVIX
FCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVIXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

1.72

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

2.39

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.13

+1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.66

9.04

+3.62

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVIXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.72

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.79

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.78

-0.31

Drawdowns

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVIX drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-49.19%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-11.30%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-19.75%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-32.59%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.61%

-32.59%

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.53%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-8.16%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.65%

+0.31%

Volatility

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FCVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

3.26%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

10.48%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

14.03%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

19.15%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

19.68%

+2.67%

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
8.47%10.10%6.09%5.19%5.92%7.96%0.48%3.49%36.40%3.65%7.15%11.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVIX dropped -57.61% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer