PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FCVH.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF) and ZVU.TO (BMO MSCI USA Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FCVH.TO is actively managed, while ZVU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCVH.TO returned 17.72%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for ZVU.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCVH.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZVU.TO.

Performance

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVH.TO achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than ZVU.TO's 44.84% return.

FCVH.TO

1D
0.53%
1M
1.33%
6M
11.04%
YTD
13.62%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
—

ZVU.TO

1D
-1.55%
1M
-3.80%
6M
36.71%
YTD
44.84%
1Y
74.57%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
18.11%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCVH.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF		13.62%22.93%23.75%21.51%-5.48%38.33%18.26%
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF		44.84%26.27%15.99%11.16%-9.46%28.55%9.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.37

Over the past year, FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF

BMO MSCI USA Value ETF

Often compared with ZVU.TO:
ZVU.TO vs. XVLU.TOZVU.TO vs. XCV.TOZVU.TO vs. ZGQ.TOZVU.TO vs. ZUQ.TOZVU.TO vs. MGKZVU.TO vs. VFV.TOZVU.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Return for Risk

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCVH.TO
FCVH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FCVH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO
ZVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FCVH.TOZVU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.44
3.32

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.47
4.11

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.61

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

12.33

-7.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

35.59

-17.12

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVH.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum ZVU.TO drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FCVH.TOZVU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-34.24%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-6.08%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-16.25%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-20.28%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-4.73%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-5.96%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.10%

-0.25%

Volatility

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) is 3.25%, while BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that FCVH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FCVH.TOZVU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

5.93%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

15.18%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

22.61%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.66%

17.30%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

18.56%

-0.85%

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZVU.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVH.TO vs. ZVU.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCVH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than ZVU.TO's 1.20% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVH.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF		0.81%1.01%1.07%0.88%2.91%1.15%3.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF		1.20%1.62%2.24%2.69%2.58%1.99%2.51%2.07%2.09%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZVU.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZVU.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCVH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCVH.TO and 0.33% for ZVU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVH.TO and ZVU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer