PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FCVH.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF) and ZVC.TO (BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FCVH.TO is actively managed, while ZVC.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCVH.TO returned 17.72%/yr vs 17.40%/yr for ZVC.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCVH.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZVC.TO.

Performance

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVH.TO achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than ZVC.TO's 18.09% return.

FCVH.TO

1D
0.53%
1M
1.33%
6M
11.04%
YTD
13.62%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
—

ZVC.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
1.30%
6M
13.46%
YTD
18.09%
1Y
42.77%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCVH.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF		13.62%22.93%23.75%21.51%-5.48%38.33%18.26%
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF		18.09%31.10%15.40%11.10%2.25%31.48%18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.41

The correlation between FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF

BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF

Often compared with ZVC.TO:
ZVC.TO vs. ZCN.TOZVC.TO vs. VCN.TOZVC.TO vs. ZLB.TOZVC.TO vs. XCV.TOZVC.TO vs. XIC.TOZVC.TO vs. VDY.TOZVC.TO vs. XCS.TO

Return for Risk

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCVH.TO
FCVH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FCVH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO
ZVC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FCVH.TOZVC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.44
3.95

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.47
5.21

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.72

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

7.03

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

32.86

-14.39

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is lower than the ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVH.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum ZVC.TO drawdown of -41.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FCVH.TOZVC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-41.00%

+20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-6.11%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-13.34%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-16.16%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-4.84%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.31%

+0.54%

Volatility

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF (FCVH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) at 2.50%. This indicates that FCVH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FCVH.TOZVC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.50%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.58%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

10.90%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.66%

13.68%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.28%

+0.43%

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVH.TO vs. ZVC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCVH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than ZVC.TO's 1.93% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCVH.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value Currency Neutral ETF		0.81%1.01%1.07%0.88%2.91%1.15%3.34%0.00%0.00%
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF		1.93%2.23%2.88%3.34%2.98%2.43%3.32%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCVH.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCVH.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZVC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCVH.TO and 0.40% for ZVC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVH.TO and ZVC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer