FCVCX vs. TASVX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FCVCX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C) and TASVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCVCX returned 10.31%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for TASVX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FCVCX charges 2.02%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for TASVX.

Performance

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVCX achieves a 24.90% return, which is significantly higher than TASVX's 23.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVCX has underperformed TASVX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while TASVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.

FCVCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 19.15%
• YTD: 24.90%
• 1Y: 37.49%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: 10.31%
• ALL TIME*: 9.84%

TASVX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 16.72%
• YTD: 23.55%
• 1Y: 46.66%
• 3Y*: 21.28%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 11.15%
• ALL TIME*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	24.90%	6.93%	6.82%	16.65%	-13.97%	36.71%	9.98%	19.64%	-16.02%	11.11%
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund	23.55%	13.71%	18.76%	16.92%	-11.44%	41.68%	-3.08%	15.56%	-19.00%	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVCX and TASVX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.95

The correlation between FCVCX and TASVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCVCX vs. TASVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVCX

FCVCX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FCVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FCVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FCVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FCVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FCVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

TASVX

TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 93
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCVCX	TASVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.52	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.66	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.44	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	4.83	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	17.05	-5.67

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the TASVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVCX and TASVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVCX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, roughly equal to the maximum TASVX drawdown of -59.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVCX and TASVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVCX	TASVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-59.79%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-8.75%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.11%	-23.91%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-24.62%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.31%	-59.79%	+14.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-0.85%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-8.46%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	2.48%	+0.47%

Volatility

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) at 3.49%. This indicates that FCVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TASVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVCX	TASVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	3.49%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.50%	11.51%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.92%	16.84%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	22.38%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	26.35%	-4.02%

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVCX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TASVX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVCX vs. TASVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than TASVX's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	9.89%	12.35%	5.46%	5.97%	7.23%	8.53%	0.13%	3.34%	41.61%	3.03%	7.26%	11.44%
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund	1.05%	1.29%	26.54%	3.43%	22.08%	1.46%	1.38%	2.81%	10.87%	13.42%	1.83%	45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVCX and TASVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FCVCX and TASVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCVCX or TASVX?

FCVCX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to TASVX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVCX dropped -58.55% vs TASVX's -59.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.