PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVAX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVAX achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than VRTVX's 20.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVAX has outperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 11.52%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.


FCVAX

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.88%
YTD
23.07%
6M
20.33%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
11.52%

VRTVX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.38%
YTD
20.90%
6M
18.36%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
23.07%7.75%7.72%17.47%-13.29%37.77%10.82%20.47%-15.50%11.99%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.90%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVAX and VRTVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.96

The correlation between FCVAX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVAX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVAX
FCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVAXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

5.03

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

17.09

-4.36

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVAX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.86%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVAX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVAXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.86%

-45.98%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.41%

-8.54%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

-26.85%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-26.85%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-45.98%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.25%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-7.75%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.51%

+0.46%

Volatility

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) at 5.29%. This indicates that FCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVAXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.29%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

12.48%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

18.24%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.66%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

23.72%

-1.37%

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVAX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVAX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than VRTVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
8.37%10.30%4.77%5.19%6.11%7.94%0.30%3.32%37.11%3.43%7.01%11.07%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FCVAX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVAX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to VRTVX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVAX dropped -57.86% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVAX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer