PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVAX vs. TSLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCVAX having a 27.34% return and TSLTX slightly lower at 27.08%.


FCVAX

1D
1.75%
1M
0.58%
6M
19.04%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.27%
ALL TIME*
10.79%

TSLTX

1D
1.23%
1M
1.23%
6M
16.90%
YTD
27.08%
1Y
42.97%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
27.34%7.75%7.72%17.47%-13.29%37.77%10.82%20.47%-15.88%
TSLTX
Transamerica Small Cap Value
27.08%9.56%12.59%8.84%-12.51%31.10%5.99%20.91%-16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVAX and TSLTX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FCVAX and TSLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVAX vs. TSLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVAX
FCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLTX
TSLTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TSLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVAXTSLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

5.86

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

19.26

-5.29

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the TSLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVAX and TSLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.86%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLTX drawdown of -55.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVAX and TSLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVAXTSLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.86%

-55.58%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.41%

-7.73%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

-26.62%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-55.58%

+30.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-14.28%

+13.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-28.19%

+20.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.35%

+0.56%

Volatility

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX) at 3.68%. This indicates that FCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVAXTSLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.68%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

11.03%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

16.20%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

49.93%

-29.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

43.20%

-20.88%

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVAX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLTX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVAX vs. TSLTX - Dividend Comparison

FCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than TSLTX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
8.09%10.30%4.77%5.19%6.11%7.94%0.30%3.32%37.11%3.43%7.01%11.07%
TSLTX
Transamerica Small Cap Value
4.23%5.38%27.99%2.99%21.70%77.67%0.24%4.26%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FCVAX and TSLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVAX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to TSLTX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVAX dropped -57.86% vs TSLTX's -55.58%.

TSLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVAX and TSLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer