FCVAX vs. PVCMX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FCVAX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A) and PVCMX (Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCVAX returned 10.37%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for PVCMX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCVAX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for PVCMX.

Performance

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVAX achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 4.94% return.

FCVAX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 19.04%
• YTD: 27.34%
• 1Y: 37.84%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 11.27%
• ALL TIME*: 10.79%

PVCMX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 3.16%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: 5.89%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCVAX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCVAX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A	27.34%	7.75%	7.72%	17.47%	-13.29%	37.77%	10.82%	9.79%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	4.94%	4.45%	4.24%	9.47%	3.17%	3.72%	19.13%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVAX and PVCMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019	0.67

The correlation between FCVAX and PVCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCVAX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVAX

FCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PVCMX

PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCVAX	PVCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.88	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.92	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.35	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	2.99	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	9.16	+4.81

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVAX and PVCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.86%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVAX and PVCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVAX	PVCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.86%	-7.44%	-50.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.41%	-2.81%	-7.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.90%	-7.44%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.90%	-7.44%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-0.39%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-1.25%	-6.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	0.91%	+2.00%

Volatility

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 2.00%. This indicates that FCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVAX	PVCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	2.00%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	3.37%	+10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	4.48%	+13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	5.30%	+15.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.32%	6.30%	+16.02%

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVAX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVAX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

FCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than PVCMX's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVAX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A	8.09%	10.30%	4.77%	5.19%	6.11%	7.94%	0.30%	3.32%	37.11%	3.43%	7.01%	11.07%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	4.57%	4.80%	6.95%	4.84%	2.30%	1.98%	2.70%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVAX and PVCMX in my portfolio?

FCVAX and PVCMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVAX or PVCMX?

FCVAX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to PVCMX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVAX dropped -57.86% vs PVCMX's -7.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.