PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVAX vs. FIKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCVAX having a 26.35% return and FIKNX slightly higher at 26.59%.


FCVAX

1D
0.29%
1M
2.88%
6M
19.57%
YTD
26.35%
1Y
37.05%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.18%

FIKNX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.93%
6M
19.82%
YTD
26.59%
1Y
37.61%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
26.35%7.75%7.72%17.47%-13.29%37.77%10.82%20.47%-13.49%
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
26.59%8.18%8.00%17.97%-12.98%38.27%11.35%20.98%-13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVAX and FIKNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FCVAX and FIKNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVAX vs. FIKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVAX
FCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKNX
FIKNX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FIKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVAXFIKNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.35

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

11.74

-0.29

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FIKNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVAX and FIKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.86%, which is greater than FIKNX's maximum drawdown of -44.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVAX and FIKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVAXFIKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.86%

-44.09%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.41%

-10.35%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

-24.87%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-24.87%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.67%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-7.56%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.95%

+0.03%

Volatility

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A (FCVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) have volatilities of 4.30% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVAXFIKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

4.26%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

13.48%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

18.03%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

20.93%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

24.54%

-2.24%

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVAX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKNX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVAX vs. FIKNX - Dividend Comparison

FCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, which matches FIKNX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVAX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class A
8.15%10.30%4.77%5.19%6.11%7.94%0.30%3.32%37.11%3.43%7.01%11.07%
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
8.09%10.24%4.82%5.32%5.92%8.07%0.58%3.65%8.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCVAX and FIKNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVAX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to FIKNX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVAX dropped -57.86% vs FIKNX's -44.09%.

FIKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVAX and FIKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer