PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than PMIF.TO's 0.10% return.


FCUV.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
8.58%
YTD
15.14%
6M
12.61%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
26.57%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*

PMIF.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.42%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
15.14%14.80%35.81%19.98%2.58%38.55%10.80%
PMIF.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
0.10%9.01%5.20%7.58%-6.32%1.90%6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.10

The correlation between FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCUV.TO
PMIF.TO

Technology

27.5%

-

Financial Services

18.8%
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%

-

Industrials

14.1%

-

Basic Materials

9.2%

-

Utilities

8.5%

-

Communication Services

3.6%
12.1%

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

55.5%

Technology

FCUV.TO
27.5%
PMIF.TO

-

Financial Services

FCUV.TO
18.8%
PMIF.TO
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCUV.TO
15.3%
PMIF.TO

-

Industrials

FCUV.TO
14.1%
PMIF.TO

-

Basic Materials

FCUV.TO
9.2%
PMIF.TO

-

Utilities

FCUV.TO
8.5%
PMIF.TO

-

Communication Services

FCUV.TO
3.6%
PMIF.TO
12.1%

Healthcare

FCUV.TO
3.0%
PMIF.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

FCUV.TO

-

PMIF.TO

-

Energy

FCUV.TO

-

PMIF.TO

-

Real Estate

FCUV.TO

-

PMIF.TO
55.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUV.TO
FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PMIF.TO
PMIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PMIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PMIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUV.TOPMIF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

2.10

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.28

7.96

+10.32

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the PMIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUV.TOPMIF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.93

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

0.66

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.57

+0.98

Drawdowns

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum PMIF.TO drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUV.TOPMIF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-18.30%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-3.22%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-3.98%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

-10.25%

-6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.21%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-1.88%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.85%

+1.05%

Volatility

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF.TO) at 1.64%. This indicates that FCUV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUV.TOPMIF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

1.64%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

2.89%

+8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

3.52%

+10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

4.79%

+10.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

5.83%

+8.89%

Dividends

FCUV.TO vs. PMIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than PMIF.TO's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
0.91%1.13%1.03%1.42%2.71%1.40%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PMIF.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
5.42%5.50%6.95%6.06%3.73%3.22%3.58%3.80%3.51%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUV.TO and PMIF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer