PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.88%14.80%14.72%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
0.94%14.07%26.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than FCMO.NEO's 0.94% return.


FCUV.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
1.88%
6M
5.01%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
19.54%
10Y*

FCMO.NEO

1D
1.46%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCUV.TO and FCMO.NEO have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Return for Risk

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUV.TO
FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMO.NEO
FCMO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUV.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.81

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.80

5.08

-0.28

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUV.TO and FCMO.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUV.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

1.01

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FCUV.TO and FCMO.NEO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.36% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.03%1.13%1.03%1.42%2.71%1.40%1.14%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF
0.36%0.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum FCMO.NEO drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and FCMO.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUV.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-21.77%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-13.90%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-5.35%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-3.12%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.97%

-0.62%

Volatility

FCUV.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) is 4.71%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that FCUV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCUV.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

8.84%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

14.74%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

24.21%

-5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

20.68%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

20.68%

-5.96%