PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.19%14.80%35.81%19.98%2.58%32.03%
FBAL.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF
0.90%12.92%19.42%13.96%-7.02%11.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than FBAL.NEO's 0.90% return.


FCUV.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
1.19%
6M
5.84%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*

FBAL.NEO

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.59%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUV.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBAL.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUV.TO
FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FBAL.NEO
FBAL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FBAL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUV.TOFBAL.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.33

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.80

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.67

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.06

6.56

-1.50

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FBAL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUV.TO and FBAL.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUV.TOFBAL.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.33

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

1.16

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

1.12

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between FCUV.TO and FBAL.NEO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FBAL.NEO's 1.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FCUV.TO
Fidelity U.S. Value ETF
1.04%1.13%1.03%1.42%2.71%1.40%1.14%
FBAL.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF
1.60%1.61%1.42%1.71%4.48%1.08%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than FBAL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and FBAL.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUV.TOFBAL.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-13.83%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-7.39%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

-13.83%

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-3.78%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-2.48%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.89%

+1.45%

Volatility

FCUV.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) at 4.00%. This indicates that FCUV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBAL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCUV.TOFBAL.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.00%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

6.03%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

8.91%

+10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

8.60%

+6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

8.57%

+6.15%