FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO
FCUQ.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCUQ.TO returned 14.68%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for VFV.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCUQ.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUQ.TO achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.
FCUQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUQ.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF | 7.92% | 4.67% | 32.89% | 20.05% | -11.48% | 31.73% | 13.51% | 24.22% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 15.62% | 20.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUQ.TO and VFV.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FCUQ.TO and VFV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Industrials
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Defensive
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Basic Materials
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Financial Services
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Communication Services
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Healthcare
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
Energy
FCUQ.TO
-
VFV.TO
Real Estate
FCUQ.TO
-
VFV.TO
Utilities
FCUQ.TO
-
VFV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCUQ.TO
VFV.TO
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUQ.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 3.44 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 13.10 | -9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUQ.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.59 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.14 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.36%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUQ.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUQ.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.36% | -27.43% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -8.62% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -19.05% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -22.19% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.18% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -3.35% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 2.26% | +1.44% |
Volatility
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that FCUQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUQ.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.05% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 8.55% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 11.46% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 14.91% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 16.57% | +0.74% |
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUQ.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUQ.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUQ.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCUQ.TO.
FCUQ.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. FCUQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCUQ.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCUQ.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer