PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUEX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiera Capital U.S. Equity Long-Term Quality Fund (FCUEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUEX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return.


FCUEX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
0.44%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCUEX
Fiera Capital U.S. Equity Long-Term Quality Fund
0.44%7.63%10.98%21.73%-15.78%32.94%23.14%9.69%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUEX and RESGX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FCUEX and RESGX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUEX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUEX
FCUEX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FCUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiera Capital U.S. Equity Long-Term Quality Fund (FCUEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUEXRESGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

3.21

-2.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

4.33

-3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.56

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

5.89

-5.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.44

21.39

-18.95

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUEX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUEXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

3.21

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.72

-0.06

Drawdowns

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUEX drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUEX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUEXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-37.80%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-7.84%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.54%

-20.50%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-23.58%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

0.00%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-5.00%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.15%

+1.28%

Volatility

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiera Capital U.S. Equity Long-Term Quality Fund (FCUEX) is 3.12%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FCUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUEXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

5.45%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

11.00%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

14.41%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.26%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

18.71%

+0.69%

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUEX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

FCUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCUEX
Fiera Capital U.S. Equity Long-Term Quality Fund
0.94%0.94%1.34%0.29%3.47%0.86%1.20%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUEX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FCUEX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUEX dropped -33.02% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUEX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer