PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTKX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTKX achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.64% return.


FCTKX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.32%
6M
10.62%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*

DRIQX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.02%
6M
2.73%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
8.02%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
4.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
14.16%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.64%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-4.20%3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTKX and DRIQX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.63

The correlation between FCTKX and DRIQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTKX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCTKXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.25

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

9.41

+2.11

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTKX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTKX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, which is greater than DRIQX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTKX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTKXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-19.86%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.78%

-3.47%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-6.08%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-19.86%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.70%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-3.86%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

0.83%

+1.42%

Volatility

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.79%. This indicates that FCTKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTKXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

1.79%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

3.63%

+8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

4.51%

+9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

7.07%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

6.59%

+9.35%

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTKX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTKX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

FCTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than DRIQX's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.32%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.13%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTKX and DRIQX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTKX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to DRIQX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTKX dropped -30.94% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTKX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer