PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fincantieri S.p.A. (FCT.MI) and Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCT.MI achieves a -35.33% return, which is significantly lower than PRY.MI's 75.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FCT.MI has underperformed PRY.MI with an annualized return of 14.37%, while PRY.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 24.11% annualized return.


FCT.MI

1D
-0.64%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
-35.33%
6M
-38.74%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
14.37%

PRY.MI

1D
-2.30%
1M
4.73%
YTD
75.65%
6M
78.54%
1Y
160.33%
3Y*
63.84%
5Y*
40.63%
10Y*
24.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCT.MI
Fincantieri S.p.A.
-35.33%140.98%60.19%5.18%-12.10%10.02%-40.44%0.84%-25.79%164.78%
PRY.MI
Prysmian SpA
75.65%42.63%51.88%20.69%6.60%15.89%37.26%34.00%-34.69%13.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCT.MI and PRY.MI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2014

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCT.MI
FCT.MI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FCT.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCT.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCT.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FCT.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCT.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PRY.MI
PRY.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PRY.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fincantieri S.p.A. (FCT.MI) and Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCT.MIPRY.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.57

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

13.28

-13.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

33.83

-34.69

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCT.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the PRY.MI Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCT.MI and PRY.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCT.MIPRY.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

4.22

-4.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.24

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.73

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.42

-0.28

Drawdowns

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCT.MI drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, roughly equal to the maximum PRY.MI drawdown of -70.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCT.MI and PRY.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCT.MIPRY.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.81%

-70.43%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.88%

-11.89%

-47.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.88%

-43.54%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.88%

-43.54%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.81%

-48.49%

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.88%

-4.02%

-55.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-17.81%

-21.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.07%

4.67%

+29.40%

Volatility

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fincantieri S.p.A. (FCT.MI) is 9.40%, while Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that FCT.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRY.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCT.MIPRY.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.40%

14.09%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.98%

29.71%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.99%

37.47%

+10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.72%

32.49%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.27%

32.67%

+7.60%

Dividends

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Dividend Comparison

FCT.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRY.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCT.MI
Fincantieri S.p.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.09%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRY.MI
Prysmian SpA
0.60%0.93%1.14%1.46%1.59%1.51%0.86%4.00%2.46%1.58%1.72%2.07%

Financials

FCT.MI vs. PRY.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fincantieri S.p.A. and Prysmian SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FCT.MI and PRY.MI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCT.MI and PRY.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer