FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO
FCSB.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF) and ZMU.TO (BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FCSB.NEO returned 2.92%/yr vs -0.43%/yr for ZMU.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSB.NEO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than ZMU.TO's -1.04% return.
FCSB.NEO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMU.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 7.55% | 6.81% | -4.22% | -0.81% | 6.26% | 0.82% |
ZMU.TO BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -1.04% | 7.47% | 1.42% | 7.89% | -14.71% | -1.75% | 8.27% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSB.NEO and ZMU.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCSB.NEO
ZMU.TO
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCSB.NEO | ZMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 0.89 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 2.03 | +6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -12.48%, smaller than the maximum ZMU.TO drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSB.NEO and ZMU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSB.NEO | ZMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.48% | -21.30% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.58% | -3.11% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.58% | -5.97% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.44% | -21.30% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -2.86% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -4.53% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 1.36% | -0.93% |
Volatility
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) is 0.93%, while BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that FCSB.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSB.NEO | ZMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 1.50% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.15% | 3.52% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 4.75% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 6.90% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 7.88% | -2.95% |
Dividends
FCSB.NEO vs. ZMU.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCSB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than ZMU.TO's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.81% | 3.73% | 3.59% | 3.06% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 2.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZMU.TO BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.51% | 4.10% | 4.15% | 4.22% | 4.35% | 3.56% | 3.51% | 3.66% | 3.70% | 3.28% | 3.37% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSB.NEO and ZMU.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO.
Find the right allocation for FCSB.NEO and ZMU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer