FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCSB.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF) and ZIC.TO (BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - FCSB.NEO tracks the FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond 5% Capped Index while ZIC.TO tracks the Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCSB.NEO returned 2.93%/yr vs 3.94%/yr for ZIC.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCSB.NEO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZIC.TO.

Performance

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSB.NEO achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than ZIC.TO's 1.28% return.

FCSB.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: —

ZIC.TO

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 6.91%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 3.94%
• 10Y*: 3.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF	1.45%	4.15%	7.55%	6.81%	-4.22%	-0.81%	6.26%	0.82%
ZIC.TO BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	1.28%	4.24%	11.86%	6.33%	-8.93%	-1.36%	6.51%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2019	0.24

The correlation between FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSB.NEO

FCSB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 43
FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCSB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FCSB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FCSB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FCSB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ZIC.TO

ZIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 34
ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ZIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ZIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ZIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ZIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCSB.NEO	ZIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.86	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.63	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	3.51	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCSB.NEO	ZIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.50	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.60	+0.05

Drawdowns

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -12.48%, smaller than the maximum ZIC.TO drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCSB.NEO	ZIC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.48%	-19.49%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.58%	-4.26%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.58%	-6.96%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.44%	-15.66%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.48%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-5.15%	+3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	1.97%	-1.54%

Volatility

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) is 0.92%, while BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that FCSB.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCSB.NEO	ZIC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	1.67%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.05%	4.18%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69%	5.47%	-2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	7.95%	-4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	8.90%	-3.94%

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSB.NEO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIC.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCSB.NEO vs. ZIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCSB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than ZIC.TO's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF	3.78%	3.73%	3.59%	3.06%	2.09%	1.58%	2.34%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZIC.TO BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	4.31%	4.03%	3.79%	3.84%	3.93%	3.52%	3.46%	3.56%	3.46%	3.32%	3.29%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO in my portfolio?

FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCSB.NEO or ZIC.TO?

On fees, ZIC.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCSB.NEO or ZIC.TO?

ZIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FCSB.NEO.

What is the main difference between FCSB.NEO and ZIC.TO?

FCSB.NEO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond 5% Capped Index, while ZIC.TO tracks Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FCSB.NEO and 0.25% for ZIC.TO.