FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO
FCSB.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF) and MFT.TO (Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FCSB.NEO is passively managed, while MFT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCSB.NEO returned 2.92%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for MFT.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSB.NEO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than MFT.TO's 2.53% return.
FCSB.NEO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MFT.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 7.55% | 6.81% | -4.22% | -0.81% | 6.26% | 0.82% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 2.53% | 0.81% | 8.84% | 11.99% | -6.31% | 5.56% | -0.64% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSB.NEO and MFT.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCSB.NEO
MFT.TO
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCSB.NEO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.84 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 4.39 | +4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -12.48%, smaller than the maximum MFT.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSB.NEO and MFT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSB.NEO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.48% | -20.87% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.58% | -1.33% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.58% | -3.40% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.44% | -7.45% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -1.38% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.55% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) at 0.79%. This indicates that FCSB.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSB.NEO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.79% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.15% | 1.80% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 2.61% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 3.71% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 5.10% | -0.17% |
Dividends
FCSB.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCSB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than MFT.TO's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.81% | 3.73% | 3.59% | 3.06% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 2.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 8.29% | 8.57% | 9.44% | 10.40% | 6.26% | 3.89% | 6.18% | 6.97% | 6.14% | 4.84% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSB.NEO and MFT.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for FCSB.NEO and MFT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer