PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSB.NEO achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than FLCI.TO's 2.34% return.


FCSB.NEO

1D
0.43%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*

FLCI.TO

1D
0.44%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCSB.NEO
Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.76%4.15%7.55%6.81%-4.22%-0.81%6.26%0.82%
FLCI.TO
Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF
2.34%4.88%8.03%8.31%-10.13%-1.36%8.04%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSB.NEO and FLCI.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSB.NEO
FCSB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCI.TO
FLCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FLCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) and Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCSB.NEOFLCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.36

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

6.55

+2.43

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the FLCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSB.NEO and FLCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -12.48%, smaller than the maximum FLCI.TO drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSB.NEO and FLCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSB.NEOFLCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-17.51%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.58%

-2.27%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.58%

-3.31%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.44%

-14.63%

+7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-3.29%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.82%

-0.39%

Volatility

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) is 0.77%, while Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that FCSB.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSB.NEOFLCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.23%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

3.00%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73%

3.96%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

5.64%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

6.47%

-1.53%

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSB.NEO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCI.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCSB.NEO vs. FLCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCSB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than FLCI.TO's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSB.NEO
Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
3.77%3.73%3.59%3.06%2.09%1.58%2.34%0.38%0.00%0.00%
FLCI.TO
Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF
4.40%4.26%4.41%4.09%4.95%3.35%3.25%3.68%3.87%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSB.NEO and FLCI.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLCI.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FCSB.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FCSB.NEO and 0.39% for FLCI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSB.NEO and FLCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer