FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO
FCQH.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral ETF) and ESGY.TO (BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCQH.TO is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ESGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Selection Index. FCQH.TO is actively managed, while ESGY.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCQH.TO returned 8.90%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for ESGY.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCQH.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for ESGY.TO.
Performance
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCQH.TO achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than ESGY.TO's 9.51% return.
FCQH.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
ESGY.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 20.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$61.83K | CA$62.00K | CA$52.95K | |
| CA$36.02K | CA$32.28K | CA$34.96K |
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCQH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral ETF | 3.83% | 9.95% | 22.06% | 21.43% | -17.97% | 33.05% | 4.77% |
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 9.51% | 13.67% | 33.83% | 26.54% | -15.46% | 30.67% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCQH.TO and ESGY.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between FCQH.TO and ESGY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Industrials
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Consumer Defensive
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Basic Materials
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Financial Services
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Communication Services
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Healthcare
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Real Estate
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
Energy
FCQH.TO
-
ESGY.TO
Utilities
FCQH.TO
-
ESGY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCQH.TO
ESGY.TO
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral ETF (FCQH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCQH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.93 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 6.94 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCQH.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.90%, which is greater than ESGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCQH.TO and ESGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCQH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.90% | -26.36% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -10.62% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.32% | -20.83% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | -22.89% | -4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -3.59% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -5.23% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.96% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral ETF (FCQH.TO) is 2.55%, while BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that FCQH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCQH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 3.27% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 9.86% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 12.77% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 15.61% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 16.81% | +18.98% |
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCQH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGY.TO's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCQH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCQH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than ESGY.TO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.12% | 1.44% | 0.00% |
FCQH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral ETF | 0.70% | 0.58% | 0.80% | 0.87% | 1.13% | 0.80% | 1.18% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCQH.TO and ESGY.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGY.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCQH.TO.
FCQH.TO is categorized as Quality Factor, while ESGY.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCQH.TO and 0.23% for ESGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCQH.TO and ESGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer