PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPCX vs. SAHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPCX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than SAHMX's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPCX has underperformed SAHMX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SAHMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


FCPCX

1D
2.50%
1M
7.87%
YTD
13.42%
6M
13.21%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
9.70%

SAHMX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
10.81%
6M
11.38%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCPCX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
13.42%17.45%6.97%26.32%-27.27%11.10%20.98%31.41%-13.67%34.46%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
10.81%44.08%5.44%16.49%-3.70%17.59%-2.48%14.61%-17.95%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPCX and SAHMX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FCPCX and SAHMX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPCX vs. SAHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPCX
FCPCX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FCPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SAHMX
SAHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SAHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SAHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCPCXSAHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.19

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

14.00

-9.52

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the SAHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPCX and SAHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPCX drawdown since its inception was -68.27%, roughly equal to the maximum SAHMX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPCX and SAHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPCXSAHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.27%

-66.58%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-8.72%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-14.85%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.83%

-25.10%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.83%

-48.63%

+10.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.72%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-16.15%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

2.50%

+1.44%

Volatility

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to SA International Value Fund (SAHMX) at 2.76%. This indicates that FCPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPCXSAHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

2.76%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

9.41%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

12.32%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

15.47%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

16.38%

+1.82%

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SAHMX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCPCX vs. SAHMX - Dividend Comparison

FCPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than SAHMX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPCX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
5.54%6.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
4.83%5.35%3.57%3.46%4.06%3.05%2.09%3.66%1.93%2.46%2.89%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCPCX and SAHMX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPCX has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to SAHMX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPCX dropped -68.27% vs SAHMX's -66.58%.

SAHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPCX and SAHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer