FCPCX vs. GSINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX).
FCPCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. GSINX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 14, 2016.
Performance
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPCX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C | -8.38% | 17.45% | 6.97% | 26.32% | -27.27% | 11.10% | 20.98% | 31.41% | -13.67% | 34.46% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.75% | 20.76% | 9.53% | 21.93% | -11.14% | 12.35% | 15.64% | 27.41% | -6.14% | 29.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPCX achieves a -8.38% return, which is significantly lower than GSINX's 3.75% return.
FCPCX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
GSINX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPCX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPCX
GSINX
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPCX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.27 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 1.68 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.27 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.80 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 7.33 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPCX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.27 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.72 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.80 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPCX and GSINX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison
FCPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than GSINX's 4.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPCX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C | 6.86% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.85% | 5.03% | 11.11% | 2.27% | 4.79% | 2.13% | 0.08% | 0.57% | 0.43% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPCX drawdown since its inception was -68.27%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPCX and GSINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPCX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.27% | -28.80% | -39.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | -8.74% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.83% | -25.46% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -6.11% | -8.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.16% | -4.88% | -12.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.15% | +1.53% |
Volatility
FCPCX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 4.84%. This indicates that FCPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPCX | GSINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 4.84% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 7.38% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 12.48% | +7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 14.44% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 15.78% | +2.02% |