FCPCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FCPCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPCX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C | -8.38% | 17.45% | 6.97% | 26.32% | -27.27% | 11.10% | 20.98% | 31.41% | -13.67% | 34.46% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPCX achieves a -8.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPCX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FCPCX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPCX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPCX
FSKAX
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.83 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 1.29 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.04 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 5.05 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.83 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.59 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.72 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.78 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPCX and FSKAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FCPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPCX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C | 6.86% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPCX drawdown since its inception was -68.27%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.27% | -35.01% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | -12.42% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.83% | -25.39% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.83% | -35.01% | -2.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -8.92% | -5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.16% | -4.05% | -13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.57% | +1.11% |
Volatility
FCPCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FCPCX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FCPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 4.42% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 9.40% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 18.50% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 17.38% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 18.42% | -0.62% |