FCPAX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FCPAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPAX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | -4.94% | 18.40% | 7.76% | 27.31% | -26.75% | 11.98% | 21.90% | 32.36% | -13.07% | 35.50% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -3.98% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPAX achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPAX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 8.83%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.
FCPAX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
FSKAX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPAX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPAX
FSKAX
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 0.98 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.49 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.50 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 7.20 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.98 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.61 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.79 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPAX and FSKAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FCPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than FSKAX's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPAX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | 6.00% | 5.70% | 0.54% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.22% | 0.05% | 0.11% | 0.05% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.06% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPAX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPAX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.31% | -35.01% | -30.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -12.42% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.36% | -25.39% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | -35.01% | -2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.41% | -6.20% | -5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.09% | -4.05% | -11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.60% | +1.09% |
Volatility
FCPAX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FCPAX) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 5.52%. This indicates that FCPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 5.52% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 9.85% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 18.69% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 17.42% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 18.44% | -0.58% |