PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) and HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCO2.DE achieves a -10.46% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ.DE's -18.13% return.


FCO2.DE

1D
-2.02%
1M
2.15%
YTD
-10.46%
6M
-8.03%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-3.01%
5Y*
10Y*

EMQQ.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-18.13%
6M
-20.69%
1Y
-18.98%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-10.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FCO2.DE
HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC
-10.46%20.70%-11.00%-5.14%-0.32%
EMQQ.DE
HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF
-18.13%5.41%20.08%1.14%-8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FCO2.DE and EMQQ.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCO2.DE
FCO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FCO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ.DE
EMQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) and HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCO2.DEEMQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.86

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.63

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

-1.21

+1.61

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCO2.DE and EMQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCO2.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

-0.94

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.08

-0.15

Drawdowns

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.49%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ.DE drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCO2.DE and EMQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCO2.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.49%

-67.94%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.46%

-28.95%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-28.95%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.40%

-56.76%

+32.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-35.78%

+12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.41%

15.16%

-2.75%

Volatility

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) is 5.99%, while HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that FCO2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCO2.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.84%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.94%

15.08%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.69%

19.59%

+7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.04%

30.98%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.04%

30.78%

+3.26%

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCO2.DE has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EMQQ.DE's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCO2.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCO2.DE nor EMQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FCO2.DE and EMQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for FCO2.DE.

FCO2.DE is categorized as Commodities, while EMQQ.DE is Technology Equities. FCO2.DE tracks EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA), while EMQQ.DE tracks EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for FCO2.DE and 0.86% for EMQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCO2.DE and EMQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer