FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE
FCO2.DE (HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC) and ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - FCO2.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA), while ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCO2.DE returned 4.93% vs 15.88% for ASWC.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCO2.DE charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ASWC.DE.
Performance
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCO2.DE achieves a -10.46% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 13.04% return.
FCO2.DE
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- -10.46%
- 6M
- -8.03%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -3.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCO2.DE HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC | -10.46% | 20.70% | -11.00% | -10.53% |
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCO2.DE and ASWC.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FCO2.DE
ASWC.DE
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCO2.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.36 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 3.10 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCO2.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.84 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.91 | -1.98 |
Drawdowns
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.49%, which is greater than ASWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCO2.DE and ASWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCO2.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.49% | -12.58% | -35.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -12.58% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.40% | -2.83% | -21.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -2.47% | -20.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 5.51% | +6.90% |
Volatility
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) have volatilities of 5.99% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCO2.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 5.89% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.94% | 15.89% | +7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.69% | 20.35% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.04% | 19.12% | +14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.04% | 19.12% | +14.92% |
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCO2.DE has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCO2.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCO2.DE nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCO2.DE and ASWC.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASWC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASWC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for FCO2.DE.
FCO2.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ASWC.DE is Aerospace & Defense. FCO2.DE tracks EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA), while ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for FCO2.DE and 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for FCO2.DE and ASWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer