PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. VPMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than VPMCX's 25.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCNTX having a 17.43% annualized return and VPMCX not far ahead at 17.57%.


FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%

VPMCX

1D
0.35%
1M
12.86%
YTD
25.40%
6M
26.79%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
17.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
25.40%29.60%13.23%28.16%-15.22%21.64%17.16%27.78%-1.99%28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and VPMCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1984

0.86

The correlation between FCNTX and VPMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCNTX
VPMCX

Technology

27.0%
28.9%

Communication Services

21.2%
7.7%

Financial Services

13.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.8%

Healthcare

9.2%
25.1%

Industrials

8.6%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.1%

Energy

3.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.6%

Utilities

0.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

FCNTX
27.0%
VPMCX
28.9%

Communication Services

FCNTX
21.2%
VPMCX
7.7%

Financial Services

FCNTX
13.8%
VPMCX
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FCNTX
10.1%
VPMCX
11.8%

Healthcare

FCNTX
9.2%
VPMCX
25.1%

Industrials

FCNTX
8.6%
VPMCX
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

FCNTX
3.7%
VPMCX
1.1%

Energy

FCNTX
3.6%
VPMCX
1.8%

Basic Materials

FCNTX
2.1%
VPMCX
1.6%

Utilities

FCNTX
0.5%
VPMCX
0.0%

Real Estate

FCNTX
0.1%
VPMCX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. VPMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VPMCX
VPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNTXVPMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

3.75

-2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

5.04

-2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.65

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

5.12

-2.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

23.59

-14.55

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the VPMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and VPMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNTXVPMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.75

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.91

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.92

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, roughly equal to the maximum VPMCX drawdown of -50.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and VPMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXVPMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-50.45%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.73%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-20.56%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-25.25%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-32.65%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-7.41%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.54%

+0.11%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is 3.26%, while Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that FCNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXVPMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

6.18%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

12.85%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

16.02%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

18.26%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

19.19%

+0.49%

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VPMCX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. VPMCX - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than VPMCX's 13.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
13.04%16.36%6.62%7.16%9.85%10.08%9.74%7.15%8.32%4.53%5.05%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and VPMCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPMCX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs VPMCX's -50.45%.

VPMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and VPMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer